<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unfolding Neurons &#187; Technology Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unfoldingneurons.com/tag/technology-tips/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unfoldingneurons.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Finally a Backup (and sync) System that Works!</title>
		<link>http://unfoldingneurons.com/2007/finally-a-backup-and-sync-system-that-works</link>
		<comments>http://unfoldingneurons.com/2007/finally-a-backup-and-sync-system-that-works#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 04:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Talkin Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon-s3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backing-up-files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup-solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hamachi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard-drive-failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideal-backup-solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logmein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror-copy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s3-backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sync-solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syncing-files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfoldingneurons.com/2007/finally-a-backup-and-sync-system-that-works</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some time I&#8217;ve been looking for a way to reliably backup all my personal and work related files on both my home and office computers that is as maintenance and hands-off as I can get it.? This &#8220;holy grail&#8221; &#8230; <a href="http://unfoldingneurons.com/2007/finally-a-backup-and-sync-system-that-works">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some time I&#8217;ve been looking for a way to reliably backup all my personal and work related files on both my home and office computers that is as maintenance and hands-off as I can get it.? This &#8220;holy grail&#8221; of start-and-forget operability has been elusive&#8230;until now.</p>
<h3>Why backups?</h3>
<p>Quite simply &#8211; as any computer guru will tell you (or someone who&#8217;s learned the hard way!) &#8211; hard drive failure is not an if, but a when.? No matter how well a hard drive is manufactured it is still mechanical and subject to wear and tear.? Eventually it will fail.? Backing up your data is just plain smart if you don&#8217;t want to lose any of your hard work. It is something that is even more necessary in this age of digital media &#8211; who really wants to lose their years of photo memories, or that cache of mp3&#8242;s they&#8217;ve been gradually amassing?? If you don&#8217;t have a backup system &#8211; there&#8217;s really no time to waste and it should be the first thing on your to-do list in the immediate future.</p>
<h3>The ideal backup solution &#8211; what does it look like?</h3>
<p>Backups are one of those necessary things &#8211; like eating vegetables.? Everyone knows that we should eat a certain amount of vegetables every day, but most of us really don&#8217;t want to take the time or the effort to get that healthy helping of greens.? Heck, some of us don&#8217;t even like them!</p>
<p>The ideal backup solution is one that fills the following criteria:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s reliable</span> &#8211; Put simply.? If your data doesn&#8217;t restore from the backup when you need it then the backup is worthless.? A backup should be something you can count on when the unthinkable happens.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s redundant</span> &#8211; No backup can ever be 100% reliable. That&#8217;s why a good back-up solution should have multiple copies should one fail.? Redundancy can mean different locations for the backup, different sets of backups, or different media copies.? The ideal solution will have all of those.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s automatic</span> &#8211; Ideally, once you set up what you want backed up you shouldn&#8217;t have to think about it.? Kind of like breathing &#8211; how many of us really think about pumping our lungs full of oxygen? It just happens.? Backups <em>should </em>be like that too!</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s current</span> &#8211; If the most recent back-up you have is 2 months old when you go to restore after a computer melt-down &#8211; you might have a case of heeby-jeebies.? Heeby = &#8220;whew, I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;ve got a backup&#8221; &#8211; jeebie = &#8220;darn, it doesn&#8217;t have that 20 page proposal I put together last week&#8230;&#8221;.? An ideal backup solution will be real-time &#8211; when you save a file, it&#8217;s archived.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s cheap</span> &#8211; not in quality of course.? By cheap I simply mean that the ideal backup solution shouldn&#8217;t cost an arm and a let to run.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s simple</span> &#8211; If the backup solution takes a degree in computer science to run then it isn&#8217;t &#8220;ideal&#8221;.? Sure, there are lots of &#8220;geek power&#8221; solutions out there that fit many of the other criteria I&#8217;ve listed above (such as using subversion, backing up to a home server etc.) but I want to have something that wouldn&#8217;t take me a couple weeks to learn how to set up or need constant &#8220;tweaking&#8221; to keep running.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Methods that work but are a pain in floppy&#8230;</h3>
<p>While I&#8217;ve long been an advocate for frequent backups &#8211; I haven&#8217;t always practiced what I&#8217;ve preached.? The main reason has been that for the most part &#8211; doing backups required time that I didn&#8217;t really have much of and more often, effort that I didn&#8217;t want to expend.? So I still did backups, but just not as frequently as I would have liked.? In the past I&#8217;ve used:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Floppy Disks</span> (3.5&#8243;) + WinZip &#8211; way back when a big hard drive was around 750mb!</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Zip Drives</span> (250mb by Iomega) + Proprietary software &#8211; a nice upgrade but still time consuming.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">A second hard drive</span> + winzip/mirrored files &#8211; Definitely faster, but I still wasn&#8217;t comfortable with the potential for dual hard-drive failure (both hard-drives in the same case&#8230;I know, my worries were probably unfounded but I still saw it as a temp solution)</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">1Gb USB Memory Stick + <a  href="http://allwaysync.com/">Allway Sync</a> between Home and Office comp</span> &#8211; This backup solution was probably the most redundant and reliable system I had going to date and definitely the one I had the most up-to-date backups for. This also had the added advantage of having a copy of my files on me at all times with the USB Key.? However, this was only useful when it was just docs and small-files I was backing up.? When I started going digital with my photos and music/sermon recordings, this backup solution just wouldn&#8217;t cut it.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">DVD-RW plus? various backup software</span> &#8211; The advantage here was size.? DVD&#8217;s could hold a whole lot of files.? However, I was back to the &#8220;disk-swapping&#8221; thing and I just didn&#8217;t like the time it took to set up a DVD burn session.? I also couldn&#8217;t settle on any Backup software for DVD&#8217;s that I liked.</li>
</ul>
<p>With the advent of broadband and the Web 2.0 revolution more and more options started appearing on the internet scene that began to approach the ideal backup solution. One setup that I tried was pretty complicated, but it worked &#8211; for a while.? I used <a  href="http://www.unfoldingneurons.com/2007/hamachi-stay-connected-a-vpn-solution">Hamachi </a>(by <a  href="http://www.logmein.com">LogMeIn.com</a> &#8211; which is a VPN [Virtual Private Network] system) to hook my home computer into my church office network.? I shared the folders for the network that I wanted to sync between my office computer and home computer and then using <a  href="http://allwaysync.com/">Allway Sync</a> and the Windows Task Scheduler system I configured the two computers to sync files between each other so that there was a mirror copy of all the files I wanted archived between the two of them. This worked well for a while but then the connection speed using Hamachi wasn&#8217;t fast enough and I started getting sync failures far too often. This backup solution failed the <em>reliability </em>test, the <em>simplicity</em> test, and the <em>real-time archiving</em> test.</p>
<h3>It&#8217;s here!</h3>
<p>Then along came the news of <a  href="http://aws.amazon.com">Amazon S3</a> (Amazon Simple Storage Solution) and a neat little free program called <a  href="http://www.maluke.com/s3man/">S3 Backup</a> that plug-ins with your Amazon S3 account to make backing up to the Amazon servers easy.? I&#8217;m not going to get into the mechanics or the step-by-step method of setting this up (maybe I&#8217;ll write that in a future article), but suffice it to say that after the initial <em>looong</em> upload of the files I wanted to archive this has proved to be fairly painless.? Amazon does charge for storage on their servers but thankfully, the cost is minimal and definitely worth it.</p>
<p>Thanks to the redundant, and reliable architecture of Amazon&#8217;s server farm I am definitely sleeping easier at night knowing that there is a safe copy of <span style="text-decoration: underline;">all</span> the files I want to be archived.? I was finally working with something that was the closest to the <em>ideal backup solution</em> that I had come across yet.? There was only point it was off on and that was <em>real-time</em> archiving.</p>
<p>Then, there was another difficulty I ran into.? What about my home computer?? Along the way I? realized that I was not only looking for a backup solution but also a sync solution.? I wanted a way to keep my working files mirrored between my office and home computer (pictures and music as well). Of course, <a  href="http://www.unfoldingneurons.com/2007/hamachi-stay-connected-a-vpn-solution">I&#8217;ve been using</a> <a  href="http://www.logmein.com">Logmein</a> for a while and although it is really easy to use this service to access another computer from a different location and work with programs and files on it &#8211; it&#8217;s still kind of slow and you don&#8217;t want to have to do things in a hurry.? So, if I could have more painless way (similar to the criteria for the ideal backup solution) of syncing files between my computers I would be quite pleased.</p>
<p>Enter in Microsoft&#8217;s <a  href="http://www.foldershare.com">FolderShare</a>.? I can&#8217;t even remember how I came across this online service other than I was googleing something and read about it in some tech-support forum.? Put simply FolderShare allows you to set up multiple computers to sync folders and files with each other.? Here&#8217;s a point form list of some features that I found very useful:</p>
<ul>
<li>You setup different &#8220;libraries&#8221;.? A library is simply a way of saying, &#8220;these are the files I want to sync on this computer with the files on this computer&#8221;.? The libraries are remarkably easy to set up and you can have multiple computer&#8217;s sync with the same library.</li>
<li>You can set up the sync to be real-time.? That means that when? you save a file on one computer it gets propagated through all the computers that are part of the same library.? You wouldn&#8217;t <em>believe</em> the time-savings this gives you!? This <em>also</em> has the added bonus of being a great backup solution which partnered with my Amazon S3 backup method closes the gap on creating a real-time backup solution!</li>
<li>You can access (download) any of the files in the libraries you&#8217;ve set up, from any computer hooked into the internet.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s free! I don&#8217;t know if Microsoft will ever start charging for this service &#8211; but if they do and the cost is reasonable it will <em>definitely </em>be something I&#8217;d pay for.</li>
</ul>
<p>Of course, there are many other features with FolderShare, but what I listed above are the predominant reasons why I use it.</p>
<h3>In summary:</h3>
<p>With the combination of Amazon S3, S3 Backup, and FolderShare I now <em>finally</em> have managed to put together what I believe to be the <em>ideal</em> backup system:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s reliable</span> &#8211; The <a  href="http://www.amazon.com/S3-AWS-home-page-Money/b/ref=sc_fe_l_2/002-7803480-4223260?ie=UTF8&#038;node=16427261&#038;no=3435361&#038;me=A36L942TSJ2AJA">writeup Amazon has about their service</a> is quite informative about the reliability of their service.? I&#8217;m reasonably confident that S3 Backup works as promised as well (which is crucial since it uses an encryption to make the file storage more secure).? However, the fact that I also mirror my files between my home and office computer ensures that I&#8217;ve got a fairly reliable backup solution in place.? I&#8217;ve been using this system for just over a month now with no problems to date.? Of course, the real test will be when I actually <em>need</em> to restore a backup!</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s redundant</span> &#8211; Two backup methods + three archive locations (home computer, office computer, Amazon servers) = great redundancy!? If one location fails I&#8217;ve got two others to fall back on.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s automatic</span> &#8211; I don&#8217;t even think about my backups anymore! Groovy&#8230;</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s current</span> &#8211; S3 Backup automatically uploads any modified/new files to Amazon&#8217;s servers once every 24 hours.? But the real beauty of this system is that with FolderShare up and running I <em>always</em> have near real-time copy of my files on two locations.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s cheap</span> &#8211; The only thing I pay for using this system right now is for data transfer to, and storage on, the Amazon servers.? But the cost is minimal.? How minimal?? Well after my initial transfer of 32gb (reading, writing, setting up buckets, deleting) and a monthly storage fee for just under 13gb of data I have accumulated the grand total of $8.50 for the month.? Future months will be cheaper because I won&#8217;t be incurring the data transfer charges ($6.55 for the month- which is more this month because of the initial transfer).? Pocket change for peace of mind!</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s simple</span> &#8211; All in all I&#8217;d say between the two methods I spent a total of about 3 hours setting them up.? The most time-consuming part of the process was restructuring my folder structure on both computers to overcome the 10,000 file limit per library using FolderShare and also making sure that the mirror&#8217;d copy of my office files wouldn&#8217;t take out the remaining space on my home computer&#8217;s main hard-drive (which it did on the first go at it lol).? But all-in-all things were pretty easy to set up.? Of course, the novice user will have a bit of difficulty understanding how to use Amazon S3 but most computer users should be able to get by ok.</li>
</ul>
<p>So there you have it.? The <em>ideal backup system</em> that works&#8230;.and a great sync solution to go with it!? (hint: If I get enough requesst for a step-by-step guide on how to set this up, I may just bump it up nearer to the top of my to-do list <img src='http://unfoldingneurons.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<img src="http://unfoldingneurons.com/2c9dca32/266bb3e0/CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html).gif" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfoldingneurons.com/2007/finally-a-backup-and-sync-system-that-works/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things not to do with email&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://unfoldingneurons.com/2006/things-not-to-do-with-email</link>
		<comments>http://unfoldingneurons.com/2006/things-not-to-do-with-email#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Talkin Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gohpc.net/wordpress/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across a post at the &#8220;43 Folders&#8221; blog (Writing sensible email messages) that has some good pointers on writing useful email messages. I won&#8217;t rehash it all here but it got me thinking of some of the things &#8230; <a href="http://unfoldingneurons.com/2006/things-not-to-do-with-email">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across a post at the &#8220;43 Folders&#8221; blog (<a  href="http://www.43folders.com/2005/09/19/writing-sensible-email-messages/">Writing sensible email messages)</a> that has some good pointers on writing useful email messages. I won&#8217;t rehash it all here but it got me thinking of some of the things I&#8217;ve learned over the years with all the emails I&#8217;ve handled (and if you&#8217;re anything like me you know what a nuisance spam is&#8230;but then nobody is immune!)  Anyway, I&#8217;m surprised how many people still follow such poor email habits that I thought I&#8217;d write a list of things not to do with email&#8230;hopefully it will be helpful.</p>
<h3>1. Don&#8217;t be a lazy forwarder&#8230;</h3>
<p>What is a lazy forwarder?  A &#8220;LF&#8221; is someone who gets a joke, or chain letter, or story from someone via email and fowards it to everyone in their address list.  I usually delete close to 95% of such emails I get from people simply because a. The subject field has a, &#8220;[FWD - Cute joke lucy!]&#8221; or b. I just don&#8217;t have the time to be reading all these things. Half the time I wonder if the person sending me the forward even knows that they sent it to me.<br />
Some helpful pointers:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Before forwarding something ask yourself if what you are about to pass along is something you&#8217;d print out a hard copy of, place in an envelope and plant a stamp on to send to everyone in your address list.</li>
<li>Although it takes more time&#8230;<em>take the time</em> to find out whether people in your address book actually want to receive those jokes, stories, or chain letters that you just have to forward.  Use your email program&#8217;s <em>groups</em> to make it easier to differentiate between these people. It will take a little time to set up but if you are a compulsive forwarder DO IT!</li>
<li>If you forward something, do a little editing to ensure that the &#8220;meat&#8221; of the email is what is seen first.  Cut out all the comments that people added (&#8220;This is funny&#8221;, &#8220;Cool&#8221;, &#8220;LMAO&#8221;, etc.) and just leave the original text. The biggest reason why I delete any forwarded emails I get is when I have to scroll to find the original &#8211; now i don&#8217;t even bother&#8230;I just crumple it up and trash it (well, figuratively speaking!)</li>
<li>Then, make sure the subject field contains a good description of the contents.  It also doesn&#8217;t hurt to add a brief message to your recipient(s) to indicate that you&#8217;ve actually read it.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<h3>2. Don&#8217;t be a myth propagator!</h3>
<p>There are numerous myths, urban legends, and hoaxes that circulate through the internet and via email.  A myth propagator is someone who receives one of these things and right away thinks to themselves, &#8220;Oh my!  I&#8217;ve gotta pass this on&#8230;I can&#8217;t believe it!&#8221;. Then the &#8220;MP&#8221; proceeds to forward it to everyone in their address book.  The problem is, they shouldn&#8217;t have believed it! Just this week I received three emails from friends that were forwarded hoaxes.  Remember:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Not everything you receive from people (even friends/trusted people because they probably just were LF&#8217;ing it) via email is true.  Before you send it off to someone else check out the story&#8230;if you&#8217;re too lazy to check it out then don&#8217;t bother forwarding it.  A good resource I use all the time that helps me determine if something is a hoax or not is <a  href="http://www.snopes.com" title="Is it a hoax?" target="_blank">www.snopes.com</a></li>
<li>Sending off stuff that is a hoax passed off for fact can be detrimental to your credibility &#8211; do you really want to become known as the joe who believes anything that comes through their inbox?</li>
<li>Sadly, I find that Christians tend to be among the most prolific &#8220;MP&#8217;s&#8221;  when we should be vigilant at what we pass on as fact.  Alot of the hoaxes that I get in my inbox have to do with religious themes.</li>
<li>When in doubt, and a story can&#8217;t be verified &#8211; don&#8217;t send it unless you can verify it.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<h3>3. Don&#8217;t be an Attachment Queen!</h3>
<p>Email has given us the wonderful ability to send documents, pictures, and different files to friends, workmates, and others.  Attachment Queens are people who fill up their email with so many &#8220;attached&#8221; files that instead of taking milli-seconds to open an email, it takes 2-3 seconds to open theirs (even longer for dial-up users).  I&#8217;m not against sending pictures via emails but please, please don&#8217;t send a whole album! Also, take the time to resize your pictures so that the file size is smaller.  Most photo album or editing software will automatically do this for you when you use it to send the pictures via email (some good software that I use is <a  href="http://picasa.google.com/" target="_blank" title="picasa">Picasa</a> by google.  Best of all &#8211; it&#8217;s FREE!)</p>
<p>Well that&#8217;s just a few of my suggestions for things not to do with email.  It would make all our inboxes a whole lot less cluttered if there were less LF&#8217;s, MP&#8217;s, and AQ&#8217;s in the world&#8230;wouldn&#8217;t you agree?</p>
<img src="http://unfoldingneurons.com/2c9dca32/266bb3e0/CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html).gif" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfoldingneurons.com/2006/things-not-to-do-with-email/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

